Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!lan!Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE!gritzner From: gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: FrameMaker 2.1x? (was Re: Interleaf vs Framemaker) Keywords: FrameMaker 2.1x Message-ID: <1990Oct29.110915@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE> Date: 29 Oct 90 10:09:15 GMT References: <2118@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de> <145@tivoli.UUCP> Sender: news@l Lines: 35 an.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de Reply-To: gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner) Followup-To: comp.text.desktop Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, West Germany Lines: 29 In article <145@tivoli.UUCP>, lark@tivoli.UUCP (Lar Kaufman) writes: |> Notes: FrameMaker 2.1x is announced (Unix Today! October 1, 1990) supporting OSF/Motif |> and the X-Window environment. Frame will be coming out with FrameMaker 3.0 |> soon, and Interleaf will be coming out with Interleaf TPS 5.0. I am |> currently evaluating FrameMaker 2.1x and Interleaf TPS 4.0, along with |> available alternatives - IslandWrite/Draw/Paint and Avalon Publisher. Under |> consideration as a future supplemental tool (not yet available on Unix |> platforms) is Author/Editor. All of these packages are deserving of |> careful consideration and evaluation. Considered and rejected (for our |> purposes) were Microsoft Word (only on Xenix platforms, apparently) and |> Word Perfect (not comfortable with WP's user interface). |> |> -lar |> Hello, I'm very interested in FrameMaker 2.1x supporting X-Windows &c.! My question is: May I use this version of FrameMaker for importing (sic) and, somewhat more important, but difficult likewise, exporting -- now it comes -- LaTeX- or at least TeX-Files like Publisher (ArborText) does. Please answer me quickly... perhaps it is faster by e-mail to lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de!gritzner. Thomas F. Gritzner Diplom-Inform.Univ. Lehrstuhl Broy, TUM