Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!mcnc!rti!dg-rtp!matrx!drd!d.cs.okstate.edu!uokmax!apple!agate!pasteur!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ucsd!usc!samsung!emory!att!cbnewsl!npn
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop,mail.framers
Subject: Re: Interleaf vs Framemaker
Summary: Seybold Report on Desktop Publishing, Vol 5, Number 2
	 October 3, 1990.
Message-ID: <1990Nov1.221907.25953@Matrix.COM>
Date: 25 Oct 90 18:52:25 GMT
References: <JONAS.90Sep26131837@his.se> <2118@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Sender: mcnc!DRD.Com!framers-request
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 4
Approved: Mail_Input@Matrix.COM
Return-Path: <mcnc!mcnc!DRD.Com!framers-request>
X-Received: by DRD.Com (4.0/DRD-4.1)
Precedence: bulk



The issue referenced has 15 pages of comparisons of Interleaf,
FrameMaker and Ventura.