Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!pacbell.com!att!rutgers!mcdchg!ddsw1!nvk From: nvk@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Norman Kohn) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: What about a Microport System V/386 3.0.1e --> 3.2.2 Upgrade? Summary: how does it measure up? Message-ID: <1990Oct31.021317.28570@ddsw1.MCS.COM> Date: 31 Oct 90 02:13:17 GMT References: <34996@cup.portal.com> <267@srchtec.UUCP> <1990Oct19.222636.9227@ico.isc.com> <4@mport.UUCP> <91 <6@mport.UUCP> Reply-To: nvk@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Norman Kohn) Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL Lines: 18 In article <6@mport.UUCP> duc@mport.UUCP (Richard Ducoty) writes: >The Runtime trade-in discount is 25%. The Complete System trade-in discount >is 40%. We must receive the original system diskettes and a letter certiying >that the original system installation has been removed from the hard drive and >all backup copies destroyed before we can ship the new release at the dis- >counted price. And now, for those of us who sampled others' wares while microport was out of circulation and found them faster, if not better: has microport's current offering been benchmarked against ISC's FFS, etc? Perhaps I missed the benchmarks (could someone mail them please?). At least 3.0e had ksh... -- Norman Kohn | ...ddsw1!nvk Chicago, Il. | days/ans svc: (312) 650-6840 | eves: (312) 373-0564