Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!info-high-audio-request From: jdhill@BBN.COM (Jack D. Hill) Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end Subject: Re: 3 mikes/3 tracks Message-ID: <7356@uwm.edu> Date: 1 Nov 90 13:49:02 GMT Sender: news@uwm.edu Lines: 38 Approved: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu In article <7333@uwm.edu> jas@proteon.com (John A. Shriver) writes: >The best examples I can think of are Kodaly's Hary Janos Suite >(MG50132/SR90132 & CD) and Bartok's Violin Concerto >(MG50134[?]/SR90003). (If you have the stereo, the mono should be >easy to find.) In both of these recordings, only the mono tape used >the 201 mike. The differences are enormous, the 201 mike is much more >immediate and clear. The stereo Hary Janos is still good enough to >compete, but I'd argue that the mono Bartok is clearly the better >recording. How right you are. I had a copy of the Bartok and for a mono I thought the sound was pretty good. So finally I decided to spring for the stereo version. When I finally found a copy and bought it I was very disappointed in the sound. The mono had much more depth, better frequency extremes and better dynamics. Luckily I was able to trade it back for a different Mercury, the Debussy/Ravel disk of Petite Suite, Tombeau... , etc. (SR 90213). While we're on the subject, why does the Kodaly Music Hungarica (SR 90179) sound almost like it's a mono? The other recording that I have with the same conductor and orchestra (and I assume in the same hall), Respighi Ancient Airs and Dances (SR 90199) sounds much more spacious. Does the recording sound better on CD? I am also curious about pressings. What is the general consensus on the following pressings that I've seen in my collection? 1. FR-? 2. RFR-? 3. SR 90xxx M 4. White labels 5. Vendor pressings 6. Orange labels 7. Mercury Wing (I have both M and RFR pressings) 8. Oval pressings 9. Different shades of purple labels I'm new to collecting Mercurys and I would like to get more information to help in my purchases. Thanks, Jack