Xref: utzoo sci.physics:15051 sci.bio:3717 sci.chem:2259 sci.med:20815 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!wuarchive!cec2!news From: delliott@cec2.wustl.edu (Dave Elliott) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.bio,sci.chem,sci.med Subject: Re: Forgotten Entities: Do You Remember Any? Message-ID: <1990Oct26.072420.28005@cec1.wustl.edu> Date: 26 Oct 90 07:24:20 GMT References: <1990Oct25.232546.12357@portia.Stanford.EDU> Reply-To: delliott@cec2.wustl.edu (Dave Elliott) Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO Lines: 43 In article <1990Oct25.232546.12357@portia.Stanford.EDU> zimm@portia.Stanford.EDU (Dylan Yolles) writes: >I'm interested in looking at the "forgotten entities" of science--entities >which were once considered somehow "real" by some or most scientists but >which were later recognized not to exist. > >The entities could be particles from physics, cells or viruses from biology, >and so on. Even entities from psychology (eg. the id, to take a silly example) >might be okay. > >I'm mostly interested in (relatively) recent examples-- say last 150 >years. But anything which reasonably well-respected scientists believed >in would be good. > >The *ultimate* example, for my purposes, would be one in which scientists >actually thought they were manipulating an entity (in the way that electrons >are manipulated by means of an electron gun), but later found they were >mistaken (and that, perhaps, the entity didn't exist at all). > ... > >Thanks! > >Dylan >zimm@portia.stanford.edu Dr. Blondel's N-rays (France, early 1900's). Recent work by Benveniste (?) on homeopathy (q.v.)... effect of a biological reagent at dilutions greater than 1 part in a trillion. Phlogiston, of course. Polywater. Probably, Fairbank's europium spheres with charges of 1/3 and 2/3 e. Superheavy nuclei in mica (the large aureole of tracks had a simpler explanation). ... David L. Elliott Dept. of Systems Science and Mathematics Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 delliott@CEC2.WUSTL.EDU