Xref: utzoo sci.bio:3787 alt.romance:5289 soc.men:23626 soc.women:29692 soc.singles:72395
Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!fluke!eris
From: eris@tc.fluke.COM (Chris Beckmeyer)
Newsgroups: sci.pschology,sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <1990Nov1.191309.6616@tc.fluke.COM>
Date: 1 Nov 90 19:13:09 GMT
References: <1990Oct24.233638.1774@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1990Oct25.131109.28884@athena.mit.edu> <1990Oct26.010447.24735@midway.u
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 14

hicago.edu>
Sender: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Keywords: linguistic quibble legitimate

In article <1990Oct26.010447.24735@midway.uchicago.edu> chi9@quads.uchicago.edu (Lucius Chiaraviglio) writes:
> Actually, what would have been suitable here would be one of
>"peoples'" or "humanity's."
>

unless the original poster was asking about the behaviour of human males.
|