Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!mcdphx!citek.mcdphx.mot.com!hbg6 From: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re:Stock Control Tags and Theft Message-ID: <13928@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com> Date: 31 Oct 90 13:19:08 GMT Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com Reply-To: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az. Lines: 31 Summary: Expires: References:<13911@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com> <2772@naucse.cse.nau.edu> <1990Oct30.181149.226@phri.nyu.edu> Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: In article <1990Oct30.181149.226@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes: >> the "security" guy said he saw me put something in my front pocket. I >> did, a somewhat used Kleenex. The manager told me to empty my pocets and >> I refused. > > What's your problem? The security guy's job is to make sure that >people don't walk out of the store without paying for stuff, a perfectly >valid goal for a store attempting to make money. He didn't pick on you at >random, or even because you fit some profile of what he considers a > [........] > The guy's just doing his job, give him a break. I'm sorry, no. The guy was a jerk going overboard with his little power trip. It's impossible to relate his tone of voice or attitude in a brief news post but trust me he did not approach the issue with a professional bearing. There probable dozens of ways I could have been confronted where I would have gladly cooperated. "I got you a$$$$le, come with me" is not one of them. John (I think I'll drop this before someone points out its non-sci.elec nature) ..................................................................... reply to 'from' address; hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com NOT the 'sender' line address! Someday my sysadm will decide this is a 'real' problem. :-) ..................................................................... All opinions expressed are mine and not Motorolas, their loss. .....................................................................