Newsgroups: sci.military Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: mikes@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Mike Sheumaker) Subject: Re: U.S. Army Division TO&Es (LONG) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Date: Tue, 30 Oct 90 05:05:27 GMT Approved: military@att.att.com Message-ID: <1990Oct30.050527.4417@cbnews.att.com> Summary: 25th Inf. info References: <1990Oct24.115039.4212@cbnews.att.com> <1990Oct25.145938.287@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Lines: 42 From: mikes@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Mike Sheumaker) In article <1990Oct25.145938.287@cbnews.att.com> jepullia@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (John Pulliam) writes: > > >From: jepullia@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (John Pulliam) >>From: Eric Price >> Can any one provide the T.O. and E. ( Table of Organization and >> Equipment) for a U.S. Army Division. This would be down to the >> Batallion/Company level for an Armoured, Mechanized, Light and >> Airborne/Airmobile Division. > >You asked for it! 8-) WARNING: this is a long posting; all readers >may want to save now, read later. Excellent TO&E info deleted for bandwidth's sake... > >Someone please correct me if I'm wrong about the 25th ID; I've never >served on the west coast. 8-) > >John Pulliam The 25th Inf. Div. (Schofield Barracks, Hawaii) is also a unique animal. Please forgive me for being so vague (don't have the FM here :) ), this is all from memory. (G Co. 725th. MT BN 1981-1984 Missile Maint.) I'm fairly sure that the Div HQ, number of Inf Bns, Engineers, Discom, etc. is the same (or real close) to a Light Inf. Div. However, there was (in 1984) a company sized Cav. detachment with approx. 12 M60 tanks. No APC's were to be found in the 25th. They are (were) a "leg" Inf. Div. Lotsa deuce-and-a-halves around. During exercises such as "Team Spirit" (similar to REFORGER only this time it's Korea), the Inf.guys were trucked to a location, then walked the rest of the way. The 25th needs to be "light" because of it's mission, defending South Korea in the event of war with the North. Korean terrain (most of it anyway) is not suited for large-scale armor battles. Unfortunately for the guys on the ground, the best way to get around in Korea is on foot...:-) Hope this is some help.. Mike Sheumaker University of Illinois Network Design Office mikes@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu