Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!emory!samsung!uunet!sco!seanf
From: seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Historical architectural advances??
Message-ID: <8553@scolex.sco.COM>
Date: 3 Nov 90 07:19:29 GMT
References: <8139@scolex.sco.COM> <0KC6TSG@xds13.ferranti.com> <8185@scolex.sco.COM> <1868@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>
Sender: news@sco.COM
Reply-To: seanf (Sean Fagan)
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Lines: 17


In article <1868@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> mshute@cs.man.ac.uk (Malcolm Shute) writes:
>Does your classification scheme handle a loosley coupled system
>(such as a department's worth of SUNs connected on a LAN)...
>Does the overall system (network) qualify as being a mainframe/supermini?

Do you, your wife, and your two children qualify as a single person with 8
arms?

No.

-- 
-----------------+
Sean Eric Fagan  | "*Never* knock on Death's door:  ring the bell and 
seanf@sco.COM    |   run away!  Death hates that!"
uunet!sco!seanf  |     -- Dr. Mike Stratford (Matt Frewer, "Doctor, Doctor")
(408) 458-1422   | Any opinions expressed are my own, not my employers'.