Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!morrison From: morrison@cs.ubc.ca (Rick Morrison) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: errors and 4 valued logic Keywords: logic, truth values Message-ID: <10356@ubc-cs.UUCP> Date: 6 Nov 90 18:49:10 GMT References: <694@creatures.cs.vt.edu> Sender: news@cs.ubc.ca Distribution: na Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 44 In article <694@creatures.cs.vt.edu> holliday@csgrad.cs.vt.edu (Glenn Holliday) writes: >Chuck Phillips writes: >>Clairification: A statement requiring the existance of the non-existant to >>be true, is simply false, not an error. However, a domain violation _is_ >>an error. (e.g. "I am green years old.") > The bald king of France has interested philosphers of language for a very long time. For those who are interested, there is a very nice paper by Russell that discusses this and related problems: @incollection{russell4, author = {Bertrand Russell}, title = {Descriptions}, booktitle = {Semantics and the Philosophy of Language}, publisher = {University of Illinois Press}, address = {Urbana}, year = {1952}, editor = {Leonard Linsky}, chapter = {6}, pages = {95-108}, note = {Reprinted from Chap. XVI, {\it Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy}, 2nd ed. London: Allen and Unwin, 1920.}, keywords = {philosophy language semantics indefinite descriptions definite descriptions} } As I recall, Russell took the view that "the present king of France is {bald, hirsute}" be understood as (Ex) (PKOF(x) & Bald(x)), respectively (Ex) (PKOF(x) & Hirsute(x)), both of which are false. The collection includes papers by Quine and others on the same topic. Great reading. ---------------------------------- Rick Morrison | {alberta,uw-beaver,uunet}!ubc-cs!morrison Dept. of Computer Science| morrison@cs.ubc.ca Univ. of British Columbia| morrison%ubc.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5 | morrison@ubc.csnet (ubc-csgrads=137.82.8.20) (604) 228-5010