Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!sun-barr!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: eli@pws.bull.com (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Fax Newsgroup -- Vote Early and Vote Yes
Message-ID: <14404@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 5 Nov 90 05:15:51 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 15
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 794, Message 11 of 13


Well, the facts indicate that Patrick's opinion that there is not
enough net.traffic about fax to warrant a separate group is just an
opinion, and probably a wrong one at that.

There is already a fax newsgroup on usenet (alt.fax).  The question is
not whether there is enough traffic, but whether the group deserves to
be in the legit comp.* hierarchy or the black-sheep alt.* hierarchy.
My opinion is that it belongs in the real-stuff hierarchy, where
(hopefully) more people can read it.

So, send your "yes" votes to "fax@telly.on.ca"


eli