Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: bill@toto.info.com (Bill Cerny)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: NT SL-1 Me{Meridian 1} vs. Mitel SX-200D
Message-ID: <14487@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 8 Nov 90 01:58:04 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 12
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 801, Message 6 of 6


I need to replace a 12 trunk by 32 station PBX with either the NT SL-1
(Meridian 1) or the Mitel SX-200D (constraint: Dialogic has cards that
speak to these switches; my v-mail software needs to talk to the PBX).

The NT SL-1 is winning thus far.  Please e-mail comments (or telephone
number if you prefer to air your druthers), and I'll provide the
consensus in a forthcoming article.


Bill Cerny
bill@toto.info.com   |   attmail: !denwa!bill