Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!pacbell.com!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!sunstorm!dhesi
From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ANSI compliant compilers [Was Re: Re: How ANSI is TC++?]
Message-ID: <2651@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 3 Nov 90 18:20:32 GMT
References: <20682@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> <660089@hpclscu.HP.COM>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc.
Lines: 11

In <660089@hpclscu.HP.COM> shankar@hpclscu.HP.COM (Shankar Unni) writes:

     I wish there were a little more context to this assertion of
     yours: I presume you mean "no ANSI compliant compilers on DOS".

I think he means MS-DOS, not just any DOS.  (If we're trying to be
precise, let's *be* precise.)
--
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi
A pointer is not an address.  It is a way of finding an address. -- me