Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!cxt105 From: CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu (Christopher Tate) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Landscape page orientation Message-ID: <90307.140743CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu> Date: 3 Nov 90 19:07:43 GMT Organization: Penn State University Lines: 33 When transforming the coordinate space into landscape orientation, what is the "accepted" procedure for placing the origin? As I see it, there are a couple of possibilities: First, you could move the origin over to the other physical corner of the page, like this: Before: | After: | | | | | <-- right left --> | | ===> | | edge of edge of | +------- ----+ | paper paper | | (X axis) (Y axis) +------------ ---------+ (0,0) (0,0) Or, you could move the origin (0,0) to be the corner of the *IMAGEABLE* page, instead of being offset from the corner by some small amount. Or, third, you could try to arrange it so that the offset from the origin to the corner of the imageable region of the page is the same after the transformation as it was before. Kind of "All I did is cut some stuff off of the top, and added some stuff on the right" in effect. Which of these is "right?" I'm tempted to use the last method, which preserves any positioning offset from the origin exactly. What say the rest of you? ------- Christopher Tate | "Living in a fisheye lens, caught | in the camera eye; I have no cxt105@psuvm.psu.edu | heart to lie: I can't pretend a {...}!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!cxt105 | stranger is a long-awaited friend." cxt105@psuvm.bitnet | -- Rush, "Limelight"