Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!blake.u.washington.edu!callisto
From: callisto@blake.u.washington.edu (Finn)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Re: CPM Viri
Message-ID: <10775@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 8 Nov 90 01:20:16 GMT
References: <1392@tharr.UUCP> <1990Nov7.112631.9252@techbook.com>
Sender: news@milton.u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 10

In article <1990Nov7.112631.9252@techbook.com> fzsitvay@techbook.com (Frank Zsitvay) writes:
>In article <1392@tharr.UUCP> pm111@tharr.UUCP (Paul Martin) writes:
>>Would it surprise the net if I said that CPM Plus is not immune to
>after the retirement of 2.2 in favor of msdos, so you don't see many 
>viruses around.
>
>
I understand that cp/m virus was invented and that was quite lethal, 
but it didn't go very far.  Probably had something to do with the
>200 K library of system specific overlay files that came with it. ;}