Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games Subject: Re: IBM a great game machine (an IBM guy's perspective) Message-ID: <39418@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 9 Nov 90 03:25:47 GMT References: <9240@aggie.ucdavis.edu> <1990Nov8.215641.16149@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu> Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 39 In article <1990Nov8.215641.16149@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M. Smith) writes: >In article <9240@aggie.ucdavis.edu> kuan@iris.ucdavis.edu >But I also want to do other things with my computer. And since >I don't have enough money for both (yet!) I choose the IBM. >I want to program, write a thesis that needs a word processor with >a foreign character set (WYSIWYG), display fractals, print quality >reports, and anything else I can find to do that is either fun >or profitable. Uh, Steve, no offense, but once reason I bought an Amiga that *I* wanted to program. I'd worked x86 machines before all the way down to the system level, and I have to say I never enountered anything to make me believe that a PeeCee was a programmer's paradise. Anyway: 1) The compilers for the Amiga now rival Borland's for completeness and ease of use. 2) I don't know about the word pro stuff... 3) WHY would you use a PeeCee with SGA (slow graphics adapters) for fractals? 4) If your reports are desktop, why go PeeCee there either? This is not really intended to be a flame (yeah, I know it sounds like one.) but it doesn't sound like you picked the right machine except _maybe_ for word pro. stuff. (And I say that because I haven't looked into it...) Oh well... Greg -- ---------------Greg-Harp---------------greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu---------------- AMIGA! // // Don't you just hate those long signature files? I mean, there oughta \X/ be a law. If I were in control, .sigs would get cut off if they were