Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!msi.umn.edu!src.honeywell.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!usc!wuarchive!udel!haven!decuac!bacchus.pa.dec.com!bacchus!mwm
From: mwm@raven.relay.pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: WShell 1.2 and AmigaDOS 2.0
Message-ID: <MWM.90Nov5125750@raven.relay.pa.dec.com>
Date: 5 Nov 90 17:57:50 GMT
References: <3396@orbit.cts.com> <15512@cbmvax.commodore.com>
	<bruce.4264@zuhause.MN.ORG>
Sender: news@wrl.dec.com (News)
Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica
Lines: 12
In-Reply-To: bruce@zuhause.MN.ORG's message of 2 Nov 90 19:54:03 GMT

In article <bruce.4264@zuhause.MN.ORG> bruce@zuhause.MN.ORG (Bruce Albrecht) writes:

   The ARexx command doesn't need to be in the REXXC: directory.  If it's in a
   directory in the path list, and has the script bit on, you do not have to
   type rx.

Yes, but do you get real macros (i.e. - I can issue commands back to
the shell that started the ARexx script) or just a language with an
easy-to-use System() call?

	<mike
--