Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: AmigaOS/UNIX - A Suggestion Message-ID: <6998@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 6 Nov 90 13:44:54 GMT References: <6653@chorus.fr> <6944@sugar.hackercorp.com> <8222@gollum.twg.com> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 14 In article <8222@gollum.twg.com> david@twg.com (David S. Herron) writes: > In article <6944@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > >If you're not going to run AmigaOS, why get an Amiga? > Y'know.. we've got all these '386 clones scattered around the company > on which the *ONLY* OS is System V .. Which is *why* it doesn't make sense to run UNIX on am Amiga... because those 386 clones are out there, do all the same things, and are *CHEAPER*. I expect Amiga with UNIX to cost about as much as a NeXT, and the NeXT has a much better UNIX (no, not because it's BSD. BSD sucks. It's because it's Mach). -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .