Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucselx!petunia!csuchico.edu!madams
From: madams@ecst.csuchico.edu (Michael E. Adams)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Procomm vs. Procomm Plus
Message-ID: <1990Nov05.113707.7034@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: 5 Nov 90 11:37:07 GMT
References: <1990Nov3.102741.11281@agate.berkeley.edu>
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (USENET)
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 26

To: link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Procomm vs. Procomm Plus
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
In-Reply-To: <1990Nov3.102741.11281@agate.berkeley.edu>
Organization: California State University, Chico
Cc: 
Bcc: 

I don't know about the TEC emulation, but I found that procomm 2.4.2 is just
fine for my daily needs.  And it is not bogged down with bells and whistles.
It does have a bug or two, but then all software does!  I still use my old
SideKick, and a don't think they will ever talk me into buying ms-windows.
Ya know what's the point of buying a shell that needs more ram?  Ram that
needs more speed, speed that only comes from a new CPU.  Soon you are 
buying things just to keep up with the guy next door.  And all you really
needs is a PC to help you get through the daily data grind.  A free
flame from a burned out consumer, who still likes computers.


         (___)      |  Michael E. Adams
         (o o)      |  Custom Computer Programming
  /-------\ /       |  P.O. Box 5027
 / |     ||O        |  Chico,  California  95927-5025    U.S.A.
*  ||,---||         |
   ~~    ~~         |  internet: madams@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu
No BULL bandwidth   |