Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!agate!shelby!unixhub!slacvm!esr
From: ESR@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Ed Russell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Gateway 2000
Message-ID: <90311.084804ESR@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: 7 Nov 90 16:48:04 GMT
References: <1990Nov5.155752.6728@Solbourne.COM>
 <1990Nov5.190436.20695@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <5982@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
 <16225@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 14

In response to:

>From: schikore@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Schikore)
>Subject: Re: Gateway 2000
>Date: 7 Nov 90 15:07:27 GMT
>
>Whenever someone asks about comments/complaints about a particular company,
>all we hear are bad experiences, and there is no way to tell whether any
>one particular experience is the normal or out of the ordinary.  I would take
>all of these comments not-so-seriously since all of them are just one persons
>experience.  Now if someone conducted a poll of all Gateway customers for
>their satisfaction, maybe you could draw some conclusions.  .......

September 25 issue of PC Magazine.  Not all customers but a larger sampling.