Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!vd09+
From: vd09+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vincent M. Del Vecchio)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Wanting to snub Emulators
Message-ID: <IbAWzZW00aw=I1um5N@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 3 Nov 90 02:48:05 GMT
References: <107918@convex.convex.com> <1990Oct31.140745.12752@cbnewsc.att.com> <1990Oct31.150313.9742@wuarchive.wustl.edu>,
	<1990Nov2.140502.13954@sisd.kodak.com>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: <1990Nov2.140502.13954@sisd.kodak.com>

> Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.mac.misc: 2-Nov-90 Re: Wanting to snub
> Emulators Ed Hanway@sisd.kodak.com (936)

> >So just rewrite your program, and go for a clean kill  on pirated
> >macintosh ROMs.

> And be prepared for possible legal consequences and/or subsequent damage
> to your reputation when your "clean kill" causes someone to lose
> important data.

I thought that that was the point of including appropriate disclaimers. 
Besides, I don't think you could lose data if you couldn't run the
program to create the data in the first place.  And I would sincerely
hope that no one is advocating hiding the fact that a program may not
run on a particular machine... I think word would spread pretty fast.