Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!midway!quads.uchicago.edu!sado From: sado@quads.uchicago.edu (robert anthony sadowski) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: Not another NeXT defector???!!! Message-ID: <1990Nov5.083738.17066@midway.uchicago.edu> Date: 5 Nov 90 08:37:38 GMT References: <1990Nov4.230955.4323@midway.uchicago.edu> <1990Nov5.042826.28732@world.std.com> <1990Nov5.064724.16646@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator) Organization: University of Chicago Lines: 77 In article <1990Nov5.064724.16646@agate.berkeley.edu> knrgroup@garnet.berkeley.edu (Raymond group) writes: >(pertaining to Symantec Pres. Gordon Eubanks' statement that he will not develop for the NeXT platform) > >First, this statement was made before the September 18th rollout of the >new NeXTs. Yes, the market for the NeXT looked small before then, with >only about 7,000 machines sold in a year. However, it was announced on >Sept. 18th that 15,000 2.0 machines had been sold in the two months >prior to the public showing of NeXT 2.0. NeXT is gaining momentum in >both the academic and business world. 7,000 + 15,000 + how many have since been sold since then is still not a significant market share. How many PC's are sold each year ? Hundreds of thousands. Until I see some significant figures documented in some well known publication, I will not concede that NeXT is gaining momentum in the business world. >Secondly, the statement that "NeXT doesn't make it easy for you to develop >for that platform" seems incredibly uninformed. The NeXT is the easiest >and most powerful development platform around, period. I knew someone was going to single this statement out. I didn't think I would have to qualify it with the statement that Eubanks is most probably referring to NeXT's developer support, not the wonderful and powerful interface builder. >Programmers who've used >both NeXT and Mac development tools (MacApps, Prototyper, Think C) >are almost unanimous in their strong preference for the NeXT. Prove it. Figures please. >And they end up with >nicer user interfaces to boot (because of NeXT's Interface Builder). Opinion. This point could be debated in this forum for hours. >Symantec's "resources are committed to other players." Lotus, Ashton-Tate, >WordPerfect, et al, are ignoring Symantec's lead. Symantec needs to >re-examine the NeXT market, or it will miss the boat completely. I must admit, I took this statement slightly out of context. These so-called "other players" means Windows. Given the choice between devloping for an environment that had a base of 300,000 the day it shipped and one that had (more than?) 22,000 which would you choose ? >Take words >from Symantec and Microsoft (makers of OS/2, a competitor of NeXTStep) >with a large grain of salt. These companies see NeXT as a threat. I'll take words from Symantec, the leading developer of utilities for the Mac and if not the leader, number #2 in development environments, and Microsoft, the unquestionable landslide leader in the most used business apps (word p/spreadsheets) over that of Lotus, Ashton-Tate, and WP, three industry giants who have done absolutely dismal ports of their PC apps to a graphical environment. It goes both ways. You attack the leaders by virtue of their position. > >NeXT has recruited VARs and is now entering the direct marketing game. OK, maybe I'm wrong. But tell me who they are. >I've read West of Eden and Odyssey. The picture they paint of Jobs is a >immature man lacking what it takes to make it in a business world >dominated by men in blue suits. However, they also paint Jobs as a >technological visionary, a man who places innovation and quality above >the bottom line. He was the soul of the Mac. And I think Sculley and >the author of West of Eden would wholeheartedly agree. I said the guy was great and everything. I agree wholeheartedly with what you say. My point still is that the business world is dominated by men in blue suits. Find someone to disagree with this statement. And then apply it to your own. 8^) -rs