Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!agate!shelby!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!shamash!paul From: paul@u02.svl.cdc.com (Paul Kohlmiller) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Think C / Documentation Message-ID: <28499@shamash.cdc.com> Date: 9 Nov 90 17:37:23 GMT References: <1990Nov8.161941.8062@watcsc.waterloo.edu> <1990Nov9.101313.25766@Neon.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@shamash.cdc.com Lines: 32 cheshire@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Stuart David Cheshire) writes: >In article <1990Nov8.161941.8062@watcsc.waterloo.edu> negandh@watcsc.waterloo.edu (Neil Negandhi) writes: >>I am thinking of purchasing Think C V4.0 but before I do, a few questions: >> >>I plan to run it on a 1 meg Mac+. Is this sufficient for the programming >>environment? >> [ Questions about documentation ... ] >Think C 4.02 is great. It just about runs on a 1Mb Mac+, but not the source >debugger which needs to run under Multifinder. Anyway you have little choice - >I'd recommend it as your best option. Lightspeed C worked with 1 MB but Think C 4.0 would not run "Hello World" unless I got rid of all of my INITs. So 1MB is a very tight fit. >The documentation is fine for writing simple UNIX-style command line programs. >If you want to write Native Mac style programs you ALWAYS need IM 1-5. No way >round it. They're so complete (and definitive - ie. from Apple) that no one >has ever tried to write an alternative. However, Macintosh Revealed may be >useful as a suppliment. IM can be a bit cryptic. When I got Think C it came with some special deal that included a book by Cartwright and Reed (sp?). The book is a help but it is not IM and it did not fit with Think C 4.0 but the earlier version instead. Good Luck. Paul K. -- // Paul H. Kohlmiller // "Cybers, Macs and Mips" // // Control Data Corporation // Internet: paul@u02.svl.cdc.com // // All comments are strictly // America Online: Paul CDC // // my own. // Compuserve: 71170,2064 //