Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!mcgill-vision!quiche!opus!peterd
From: peterd@opus.cs.mcgill.ca (Peter Deutsch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: NeXT behind schedule?
Summary: Yup, they're late. Read me to see how bad...
Keywords: hypercard
Message-ID: <2431@opus.cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: 9 Nov 90 16:25:33 GMT
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Lines: 60



I thought that would get your attention...   ;-)


Well, I promised to post if I received confirmation of the
rumours that NeXT wont ship this week. Sigh, they wont
ship this week.

I received a phone call this morning from my NeXT rep who
told me that the chips from Motorola are now due to arrive
on the 15th. She claims that NeXT is ready to build once
shipments of CPUs begin to arrive, and says my machines
should thus ship within four days of the chip shipment -
ie before the 19th.

Well, I was originally told in June that my machines would be
ready by the "end of October" and it looks like they miss
that by at least three weeks. Of course, Sun claim to be able
to ship once they announce.

Hmm, is there a debate here on the merits of
pre-announcing? Should NeXT (and the others who announce
before ship-date) not do this? It gives their competitors
ammunition ("they sell vaporware" which has even been said
here, despite the fact that many people have seen the
68040s running). On the other hand, this is an industry
where the price/performance leader seems to change weekly.
Keeping yourself positioned in this market is tough.

For the record, I'm not mad. I need the machines soon, but
another week or two wont break me and they've been pretty
square. Of course, I got faster response to my queries
_before_ we issued the P.O. :-) (So, how about it? What
_WILL_ you guys due to support our X project?)

Anyways, let's see what everyone has to say.......



				- peterd

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Why is it that some of the `smart' users posting about `dumb' users
manage to get _two_ copies of their signature in their articles?"

		- asked by Boyd Roberts in alt.folklore.computer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Why is it that some of the `smart' users posting about `dumb' users
manage to get _two_ copies of their signature in their articles?"

		- asked by Boyd Roberts in alt.folklore.computer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------