Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!bcm!lib!thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu
From: jmaynard@thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: Why use U* over VMS
Message-ID: <4283@lib.tmc.edu>
Date: 5 Nov 90 17:32:14 GMT
References: <1380@tharr.UUCP> <69986@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <803@inews.intel.com>
Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
Organization: University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu

In article <803@inews.intel.com> bhoughto@cmdnfs.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>Would a POSIX-compliant VMS fix this?
         -------------------
Uhm, Blair...could VMS be hacked up into POSIX compliance? If so, then it's
a looser standard than it should be...

-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jmaynard@thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu  | adequately be explained by stupidity.
         "With design like this, who needs bugs?" - Boyd Roberts