Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!goblin!iuvax!news!cartan!ndmath!nstar!adspp!benah
From: benah@adspp.uucp (Ben A. Hunsberger)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Can a 386 w/xenix support 20 light users?
Message-ID: <672@adspp.uucp>
Date: 2 Nov 90 13:21:35 GMT
References: <16304@s.ms.uky.edu>
Organization: MicroAge/Abacus - Elkhart, IN
Lines: 24

In article <16304@s.ms.uky.edu> jkb@ms.uky.edu (Keith Burton) writes:
>I have a customer who's wanting to use a '386 based system to run a xenix
>project.  The project will involve 20 terminals, but is very light duty.
>
               stuff deleted
>
>I've worked with some xenix systems before, but have never seen a PC-based
>system with 20 terminals on it.  I'd appreciate knowing first, if it can be
>done and second, if so, what i/o cards are best for such an application.
>


We're running up to 17 physical terminals in our software development
shop, all running MultiView(a product which allows up to 6 apps on a
dumb terminal).  Our programers tend to be heavy users in about 3-4
screen with several compiles going at once.

The system keeps up pretty good.  We still only have a 25 mhz model also!

-- 
Benjamin A. Hunsberger | uunet!rutgers!iuvax!ndmath!nstar!adspp!benah   
MicroAge/Abacus        | uunet!sco!romed!adspp!benah
2707 Middlebury St.    | benah@adspp.UUCP    
Elkhart, IN  46516     | 219-295-4290 (voice) / 219-522-2964 (fax)