Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:6966 comp.dcom.lans:6449
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!apple!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!vaxeline!fks
From: fks@vaxeline.COM (Frances Selkirk)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: Networking Windows with Unix: NFS or SMB?
Message-ID: <1226@vaxeline.COM>
Date: 6 Nov 90 22:14:49 GMT
References: <272306AE.4A46@tct.uucp> <2731987C.29594@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1990Nov4.192051.24858@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> <1990Nov5.210912.24480@amd.com>
Reply-To: fks@ftp.com (Frances Selkirk)
Organization: FTP Software, Inc.
Lines: 23

In article <1990Nov5.210912.24480@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:
>
>The FTP person I spoke to at InterOP claimed the Win3 market was too
>small for them to service. I don't think I need to say anything more.


WHAT ??!!?!  The version of PC/TCP being distibuted at the time we
went to Interop worked with Windows, if used one application at a 
time (and yes, I am including telnet!). AT Interop, we demonstrated 
an alpha version of PC/TCP that will allow multiple applications in
Windows. We certainly have plans for Windows compatibility. Whomever
you spoke with must have misunderstood your question.


>I voted. Did you?

Of course :-)


-- 

Frances Kirk Selkirk		 info@ftp.com	           (617) 246-0900
FTP Software, Inc.		 26 Princess Street, Wakefield, MA  01880