Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: 3D widgets in the Openlook (XtIntrinsics) env
Message-ID: <4247@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 6 Nov 90 19:31:31 GMT
References: <9011060154.AA27934@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 13

>Should we give up the name of OPEN LOOK just because it stands for something
>else?

You should give up calling the toolkit just "OPEN LOOK" with no extra
adornments, yes; before it ever was the name of a toolkit (i.e., back
when you still called it "XT+" or whatever), it was the name of a look
and feel.  (I tend to refer to the Motif widget set as "Xm", not
"Motif"; after all, absent a fair bit of legal hostility from OSF,
something I sincerely hope they avoid, I suspect you'll see toolkits
other than Xm that implement the Motif L&F.)

How about calling it, oh, say, to pick an arbitrary name, "the OPEN LOOK
Intrinsics Toolkit"? :-)