Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!adobe!asente
From: asente@adobe.com (Paul Asente)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: A tirade about inefficient software & systems
Message-ID: <8088@adobe.UUCP>
Date: 9 Nov 90 18:30:08 GMT
References: <9011072333.AA17805@islanders.>
Sender: news@adobe.COM
Organization: Adobe Systems Inc.
Lines: 12

In article <9011072333.AA17805@islanders.> fgreco@dprg-330.GOVt.shearson.COM (Frank Greco) writes:
>	And, no X extensions are involved; you're guaranteed to get PS
>	rendering with OW.
>
>	X Extensions = Batteries not (always) included

How is writing an application assuming that the X server is actually an
Open Windows server any different from writing an application assuming that
the X server supports some particular extension?

	-paul asente
		asente@adobe.com	...decwrl!adobe!asente