Xref: utzoo sci.bio:3836 sci.chem:2415 sci.physics:15290 sci.misc:4538 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca!mroussel From: mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.misc Subject: Re: Osmosis - the cause at the molecular level. Message-ID: <1990Nov6.235518.8507@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> Date: 6 Nov 90 23:55:18 GMT References: <29046@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <3703@stl.stc.co.uk> Organization: Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto Lines: 34 In article richard@locus.com (Richard M. Mathews) writes: >tom@stl.stc.co.uk (Tom Thomson) writes: >>The interesting thing is how much space they take up, not how big >>they are: it's not as if they were closely and rigidly packed so >>that the space they take depends on their size. Even with BIG >>molecules in solution, the average radius is SMALL compared with >>the mean free path. >The space occupied by small molecules and radicals in solution >cannot be anywhere near the space occupied by a DNA molecule. This is certainly true. You are both focussing on the wrong aspect of the problem however. It is not the size of the molecules that matters, but their area of contact with the membrane. Consider a simple ion in solution. It can cover an area of the membrane roughly proportional to the square of its radius. Now consider a big ugly polymer. In order to even guesstimate how much of the membrane it can cover, we need to know its conformation in solution. Suppose it is hydrophobic and "balls up". Even if it is a big molecule, the point of contact will be (to the lowest order approximation) a single atom. It therefore doesn't obscure any more of the surface than the simple ion. Suppose now that the thing loves water and stretches out into a long string. To figure out how much of the surface it covers, you have to work out in detail the statistics of such chains in water. (This is related to the problem of computing boundary visits in self-avoiding random walks of finite length.) By far the likeliest thing for reasonably short chains however is that if one end touches the membrane, no other point will (again, contact area goes roughly as the square of one atomic radius). For longer chains, we have a significant probability that the membrane will be touched in more than one place by a single molecule. This explains why significant deviations from the ideal p~c law are observed with polymers at moderate concentrations. Marc R. Roussel mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca