Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!pacbell.com!lll-winken!dweasel!loren From: loren@dweasel.llnl.gov (Loren Petrich) Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets Subject: Re: Using Newton's Method to speed up backpropagation. Message-ID: <86170@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Date: 15 Nov 90 02:44:08 GMT References: <7556@uwm.edu> <2124@cybaswan.UUCP> <6873@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lines: 42 Nntp-Posting-Host: dweasel.llnl.gov In article <6873@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> ins_atge@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Thomas G Edwards) writes: >In article <2124@cybaswan.UUCP> eeoglesb@cybaswan.UUCP (j.oglesby eleceng pgrad) writes: >>I use a quadratic interpolation line search using a couple of points in the >>search direction. This involves a couple of function evalutions in the search >>direction from which an estimate of the step size to the minimum is calculated. >>This potentially shuld be good at finding LOCAL MINIMUM but I haven't found >>this a problem in 3 years of experience. 4 D EXOR's are generally solved in >>< 10 line searches. > >Have you tried the 2 intertwined spirals problem? It really gives my >conjugate-gradient backprop neural net program a rough time with >local minima. But it is easily solved with cascade-correlation. Does anyone know of any readily-available Cascade-Correlation source? I tried writing a Cascade-Correlation routine, without very much success. I think that the problem of local minima will necessarily plague ANY localized search algorithm, because if it finds one minimum, it will know nothing about the other minima. The only practical way of getting around that difficulty, at least that I know of, is by using a stochastic approach, using several different starting points. And even that is not guaranteed to find the global minimum. I know that, in some cases, the minimization problem is known to be NP-complete, which means that there is no known algorithm which solves the problem in some power of the problem size -- all known solution of NP-complete problems go either exponentially or factorially with the problem size. However, all NP-complete problems appear to be fundamentally equivalent, and a solution of one may well apply to all. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Loren Petrich, the Master Blaster: loren@sunlight.llnl.gov Since this nodename is not widely known, you may have to try: loren%sunlight.llnl.gov@star.stanford.edu