Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!gatech!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!gandalf.cs.cmu.edu!lindsay
From: lindsay@gandalf.cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 1 double or 2 singles
Summary: a thousand pardons
Message-ID: <11056@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 12 Nov 90 05:32:45 GMT
References: <11054@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <2511@charon.cwi.nl>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 11

In article <2511@charon.cwi.nl> dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
>In article <11054@pt.cs.cmu.edu> lindsay@gandalf.cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay) writes:
> > Various defunct (ETA, Cydrome) and extant (Cray) machines have a
>What Cray are you refering to?

I'd tell you what I was thinking of, except that apparently I wasn't
thinking at all. The Cydrome didn't do it either: reading further
into the article, the 2:1 rate comes from double-cycling a 32-bit
data path.
-- 
Don		D.C.Lindsay