Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: HWT@bnr.ca (Henry Troup)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: The Real Meaning of ISO
Message-ID: <14700@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 90 19:03:00 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 16
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 822, Message 8 of 14


Ole J. Jacobsen writes:
 
> Quick note: ISO does *not* stand for "International Standards
> Organization".  It is *not* an acronym, but it does refer to the
> organzation whose official name is: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR
> STANDARDIZATION.  This "mistake" is perhaps the most common in the
> entire communications industry.
 
Isn't the real "real name" in French?  Same as CCITT is "Comitte
Consulatif Internationale pour Telefon et Telegraf" (errors in French
spelling and lack of accents notwithstanding).
 
I think that the CCITT at least dates from the period where French was
the standard language of diplomacy, and therefore international
organizations used it as the official language of choice.