Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!uunet!hsi!stpstn!cox
From: cox@stpstn.UUCP (Brad Cox)
Newsgroups: comp.groupware
Subject: Re: Consensus Journals:Nonexistent journals based upon peer consensus
Message-ID: <5802@stpstn.UUCP>
Date: 15 Nov 90 22:32:45 GMT
References: <1990Nov8.181047.17406@daimi.aau.dk> <27172@cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: cox@stpstn.UUCP (Brad Cox)
Organization: Stepstone
Lines: 15

In article >27172@cs.yale.edu> yarvin-norman@cs.yale.edu (Norman Yarvin) writes:
<dsstodol@daimi.aau.dk (David S. Stodolsky) writes:
<> A statistical 
<>procedure is used to identify the most 
<>knowledgeable representative of each 
<>consensus position...
<
<Then your method is complete crap.

Does anyone else find this retort as offensive as I do?

-- 

Brad Cox; cox@stepstone.com; CI$ 71230,647; 203 426 1875
The Stepstone Corporation; 75 Glen Road; Sandy Hook CT 06482