Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!mozart.amd.com!proton!tim
From: tim@proton.amd.com (Tim Olson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Parameter mismatch legality question
Message-ID: <1990Nov16.212511.13166@mozart.amd.com>
Date: 16 Nov 90 21:25:11 GMT
References: <1990Nov15.224353.155@mozart.amd.com> <14486@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: usenet@mozart.amd.com (Usenet News)
Reply-To: tim@amd.com (Tim Olson)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 14

In article <14486@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
| In article <1990Nov15.224353.155@mozart.amd.com> tim@proton.amd.com (Tim Olson) writes:
| >		foo(a);
| >	foo(a, b, c, d)
| >	c) Illegal

I like that answer, but what about, say the UNIX "open" library call,
which has the optional "mode" parameter used this way...


--
	-- Tim Olson
	Advanced Micro Devices
	(tim@amd.com)