Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!rayssd!sud509!heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com
From: heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Compliments to the ELM development group
Message-ID: <3196@sud509.ed.ray.com>
Date: 13 Nov 90 17:15:06 GMT
References: <918@trac2000.ueci.com> <1990Nov12.060537.16134@jpradley.uucp>
Sender: heiser@sud509.ed.ray.com (Bill Heiser - Unix Sys Admin @ Raytheon Company, Sudbury MA)
Organization: Raytheon Company, Sudbury MA
Lines: 19

In article <1990Nov12.060537.16134@jpradley.uucp> jpr@jpradley.UUCP (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:
>In article <918@trac2000.ueci.com> das@trac2000.ueci.com (David Snyder) writes:
>>I really must tip my hat to Syd Weinstein and the rest of the ELM development
> . . . 
>>I can honestly say, we get better service for ELM through the net, than we
>>do over the phone from most of our vendors (and you know what they charge!).
>
>
>We sometimes forget to say thank you, and I applaud your taking the time to do
>so, and I want to add my own appreciation of ELM and its developers.
>

Ditto.

In my recent posting about problems with patch7, I didn't mean to slam
Syd or Elm.  I hadn't tried patch8, yet, so I didn't know that it corrected
patch7 problems, and I didn't want someone else to have to try to back
out patch7 like I did.  I understand now that patch8 corrected the
problems.  Thanks!