Xref: utzoo comp.mail.uucp:5472 comp.dcom.modems:7354
Path: utzoo!censor!geac!becker!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!mtndew!friedl
From: friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US (Stephen Friedl)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: What should a new UUCP protocol do?
Message-ID: <565@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US>
Date: 8 Nov 90 15:32:25 GMT
References: <1990Nov07.155516.17815@ism.isc.com> <1990Nov8.033541.1039@grumpy.boston.ma.us>
Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp
Distribution: usa
Organization: VSI*FAX Tech Ctr, Tustin, CA
Lines: 16

John Antypas from Interactive askes what we are looking for in a
new+better UUCP protocol, then John Adams responds:
> 
> We want a protocol which is supported by all callable uucp sites.
> Do you intend to distribute patches for all existing UUCP binaries?
> A new protocol may have merit but only if it's widely distributed.

Get uunet to run it and it will become popular Real Fast.

     Stephen

-- 
Stephen J. Friedl, KA8CMY / I speak for me only / Tustin, CA / 3B2-kind-of-guy
+1 714 544 6561  / friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US  / {uunet,attmail}!mtndew!friedl

Only 6% of North Carolina blacks didn't vote racist