Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca.wv.tek.com!pogo!rickc
From: rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Re: CP/M C compilers
Message-ID: <10075@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>
Date: 13 Nov 90 20:03:34 GMT
References: <16403@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <7eVgs1w163w@ijpc.UUCP>
Reply-To: rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville,  OR.
Lines: 16

In article <7eVgs1w163w@ijpc.UUCP> ianj@ijpc.UUCP (Ian Justman) writes:
}wilker@descartes.math.purdue.edu (Clarence Wilkerson) writes:

}}  CP/M is not public domain. The major components of CP/M

}It thought that Digital Research withdrew all of its support for
}CP/M years ago.  I would think that they would have relinquished
}their rights because they don't support it.  If they still
}distribute it, but don't support it, then something is SERIOUSLY
}(IMHO) with DRI's policies, mainly because most of its work is
}devoted to DR-DOS and GEM-86 and GEM-68k.  Anyone care to rebut?

I bought a C128 a couple years ago.  It has a CP/M licence agreement with it.
So, I ASSUME that it isn't public domain.  
-- 
Rick Clements (RickC@pogo.WV.TEK.COM)