Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:33937 comp.compilers:1507 comp.os.msdos.programmer:1992
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!spdcc!iecc!compilers-sender
From: draper@buster.cps.msu.edu (Patrick J Draper)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.compilers,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: MS-DOS C compiler selection
Keywords: C, question
Message-ID: <1990Nov15.234753.24325@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Date: 15 Nov 90 23:47:53 GMT
References: <126@bwilab3.UUCP>
Sender: compilers-sender@iecc.cambridge.ma.us
Reply-To: draper@buster.cps.msu.edu (Patrick J Draper)
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University
Lines: 14
Approved: compilers@iecc.cambridge.ma.us

In article <126@bwilab3.UUCP> bwilab3!murray@gatech.edu (Murray W. Hertz, Jr.) writes:
>I am trying to make a decision on a C compiler to use in an MS-DOS
>environment to communicate with the Oracle DBMS.  They tell me that they
>support either a Microsoft 6.0 or Lattice C interface, and I am trying to

Oracle Corp. *plans* to support Microsoft 6.0, but all they do now is
5.01. As you know, Microsoft C 5.01 is almost unavailable, so if you want
to go the Microsoft route, you'll be in a bind for a little while.
--
Patrick Draper
buster.cps.msu.edu
-- 
Send compilers articles to compilers@iecc.cambridge.ma.us or
{ima | spdcc | world}!iecc!compilers.  Meta-mail to compilers-request.