Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!decwrl!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!weitek!pyramid!leadsv!hashemi From: hashemi@leadsv.UUCP (Rahmat O. Hashemi) Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: DAT versus 8mm Tape Message-ID: <13915@leadsv.UUCP> Date: 9 Nov 90 18:09:35 GMT References: <272DB1E1.9737@orion.oac.uci.edu> <9850005@hpcpbla.HP.COM> Reply-To: hashemi@leadsv.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com.UUCP (Rahmat O. Hashemi) Organization: LMSC-LEADS, Sunnyvale, Ca. Lines: 87 In article <9850005@hpcpbla.HP.COM> peterk@hpcpbla.HP.COM (Peter King) writes: + A Few Thoughts On Your DAT vs 8mm Choice + ======================================== + +I thought I would add to the current debate with a few pointers: + +* You may be interested to know that HP has just announced 2 new DAT + drives: + + - A low cost drive with 2 GByte capacity, and + - A high performance drive, with built-in Data Compression with + capacity of up to 8 GBytes. + - Both drives have a 3.5" Half Height Form Factor. + + The drives will be demonstrated at Comdex next week and should be + shipping in volume by mid-91. + + Both drives will support 90m DAT cassettes to increase capacity beyond + the current 1.3 GBytes (60m tape). The high performance drive uses + hardware data compression to enhance performance and capacity. Expect + to see a compression ratio in the range 2 to 4 (Typically around 2.5 + on most UN*X systems) giving a maximum capacity of 8 GBytes and a maximum + transferrate of 732 KBytes/s. (>2.5 GBytes/hour!). + + All in a 3.5" package. I saw this article(someone had left it on my desk) from some magazine(the article was cut out, so I couldn't see what magazine it was from). Since I am in the market for some tape generation equipment, I called HP to get some info. on these products(only 3 days ago). They told me that the article was written by someone who had misheard the facts, and the product is not really a product yet, and no specs are available now. The product may be shipable by the end of 91/early 92, and it will be an OEM product. So if you have a need right now, don't go holding your breath for the HP product. + +* Industry Analysts predict a bright future for DAT. The leading analysts + seem to agree that: + + DAT shipments are expected to outstrip 8mm shipments during 1991 for + the first time - with DAT forecast shipments running at around 150,000 + units during 1991 (up on around 60,000 in 1990). + + Forecasts show DAT shipments running at around 1/2 million per year by + 1994 - more than double the 8mm forecast of around 200,000 units. + +* Industry Analysts also predict that DAT is likely to be far cheaper than + 8mm - partly the result of DAT's 3.5" form factor. + +* The DDS Standards activity is also likely to play a major part in DAT's + success. + + The DDS Standard has now been adopted as an ECMA Standard and is + anticipated to become an ANSI Standard in the first haly of 1991. + + There are now 18 companies participating in the DDS Manufacturers Group + - including Exabyte and most of the major Quarter Inch Cartridge + manufacturers. + +* There are also hundreds of different DAT solutions. DAT is supported on + systems from HP and DEC - with third party support on Sun systems, IBM PC + compatibles, SCO Un*x, Novell etc. The list goes on! + +* Check-out Digital Review's recent article (June 90). They look at the + issue of 8mm performance and capacity. Their results are interesting. + They show that 8mm capacity and transfer rate are significantly reduced + when short saveset sizes are used. For example: + + Saveset Size 8mm Capacity + + 25 MBytes 2 GBytes + 5 MBytes 1.4 GBytes + 1 MBytes 560 MBytes + + And they also conclude that for savesets of less than 125 MBytes DAT + Transfer Rate is faster than 8mm. + + Performance and capacity are not simple "scalar" quantities - they depend + significantly upon the application as DR's review shows. + +I hope this information helps you make your choice. 8mm was clearly first +to market but the future looks really bright for DAT. + +Regards, + +Peter King.