Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!husc6!encore!mperlman From: mperlman@Encore.COM (Mark Perlman) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Multiple subnets on same cable Keywords: subnet IP ICMP fnord Message-ID: <13241@encore.Encore.COM> Date: 13 Nov 90 14:46:21 GMT References: Reply-To: mperlman@encore.Com (Mark Perlman) Organization: Independent Consultant Lines: 40 In article martino@logitek.co.uk (Martin O'Nions) writes: >freiss@nixdorf.de (the hacker) writes: > > >>This might be a silly question, but it's been worrying me for some time. >>What happens if different IP subnets live on the same ethernet cable? > >>I'm worried about excessive ICMP traffic (ICMP net_redirect packets); >>I see some SGI workstations here react to some packets from a >>different subnet with this ICMP message. > >>Could somebody tell me if this is a problem or what other >>problems I haven't even thought of might arise? >>Pointers to books, RFCs etc. on this subject are also welcome. I may have missed some of the previous posting in response, however, I'll put in my 2 cents for free. You can "turn off" subnetting by specifying a metric of 0 (zero) when you use the route command. E.G.: route add 0 You also need to consider broadcasting addresses on this multi-subnetted physical network. A broadcast address of xx.xx.xx.255 says "all hosts on subnet xx.xx.xx.0", whereas, a broadcast address of 255.255.255.255 says "all hosts an my local network". It requires some forethought on your part to assure a working broadcasts. I would reccommend getting your hands on Charles Hedrick's paper, "Introduction to Administration of an Internet-based Local Network", 3 October 1988. Hope this was useful. +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mark R. Perlman | | Independent Consultant 301-206-2016 | | 14014 Oakpointe Dr. mperlman@encore.com | | Laurel, MD 20707 uunet!gould!mperlman | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+