Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cbmvax!spence From: spence@cbmvax.commodore.com (Spencer Shanson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: A note (was Re: Here's who is using Amiga Message-ID: <15841@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 13 Nov 90 22:32:18 GMT References: <1990Nov11.183212.18785@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <1990Nov13.012333.28231@lavaca.uh.edu> <572@cbmger.UUCP> Reply-To: spence@cbmvax.commodore.com (Spencer Shanson) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 32 In article <572@cbmger.UUCP> peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) writes: >In article <1990Nov13.012333.28231@lavaca.uh.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (J. Eric Townsend) writes: >>The "Imprint" is really a Polaroid Palette. A way fucking cool film >>recorder. 900x700 resolution, automated, etc. >> >>Only problem is, Polaroid officiall ignores Amiga. You've got to >>third-party the software/hardware interface. (From Liquid Light, and >>not a bad product at all.) > >Hm, we had two different models of the Polaroid Palette. Neither needed >special software, they just took the video output (they understand >plain analog RGB) and there they went. But to our surprise the quality >was really BAD. It was astonishing what unsharpness and geometric >distortions are possible with such a small CRT (it's about 1 inch in >diameter). Perhaps it was simply defunct. > The software for the Polaroid Palette was mainly to control the exposure times for different film types. It does make a difference. >-- >Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel // E-Mail to \\ Only my personal opinions... >Commodore Frankfurt, Germany \X/ {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmger!peterk -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spencer Shanson - Amiga Software Engineer | email: spence@commodore.COM | or uunet!cbmvax!spence All opinions expressed are my own, and do not | "A picture is worth 1000 (necessarily) represent those of Commodore. | words, or about 300,000 | bytes."