Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!uc!noc.MR.NET!msi.umn.edu!umeecs!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!karazm.math.uh.edu!jet
From: jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (J. Eric Townsend)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A note (was Re: Here's who is using Amiga
Message-ID: <1990Nov15.063642.22850@lavaca.uh.edu>
Date: 15 Nov 90 06:36:42 GMT
References: <572@cbmger.UUCP> <1990Nov14.043848.27102@lavaca.uh.edu> <576@cbmger.UUCP>
Sender: nntppost@lavaca.uh.edu (NNTP Posting Service)
Organization: University of Houston -- Department of Mathematics
Lines: 19

In article <576@cbmger.UUCP> peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) writes:
>Then we must have had a more primitive model [of Polaroid Palette].
>It connected only to the
>RGB of the computer. The exposition times for each color were adjusted
>via thumbwheels (or similar) at the front of the device, and this device
>switched through the three color components while changing to the
>respective filter mechanically. Really simple.

Really fucking primitive, it sounds like.  I can't even find it in
my parts catalog (yes, I have one of those too :-) for my palette.

A Polaroid-dude once told me there were about 20 (I think) different models
of Palette made..

--
J. Eric Townsend     Internet: jet@uh.edu    Bitnet: jet@UHOU
Systems Manager - University of Houston Dept. of Mathematics - (713) 749-2120
EastEnders list: eastender@karazm.math.uh.edu
Skate UNIX(r)