Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!jetson.uh.edu!honp9 From: honp9@jetson.uh.edu (Jason L. Tibbitts III) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Pipes Message-ID: <7616.27407ef9@jetson.uh.edu> Date: 14 Nov 90 05:17:13 GMT References: <99.273647DB@myamiga.UUCP> <1990Nov8.173836.19620@agora.uucp> <7594.273e8c18@jetson.uh.edu> <1990Nov13.125723.8271@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu> Organization: Blob Shop Programmers Lines: 28 In article <1990Nov13.125723.8271@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu>, yarnall@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu (Ken Yarnall) writes: > In article <7594.273e8c18@jetson.uh.edu> honp9@jetson.uh.edu (Jason L. Tibbitts III) writes: > +In article <1990Nov8.173836.19620@agora.uucp>, billsey@agora.uucp (Bill Seymour) writes: > +> But if we now reserve | for a pipe, what will I use for an 'OR'? That's > +> what | is used for now in the AmigaDOS pattern matching... I would be all for > +> using it in piping, if it hadn't been used before. > +It is required that the '|' used as logical-or be enclosed with its arguments > +in parenthesis. In some cases, the usual AmigaDos commands will accept the OR > +symbol without parenthesis, but this is not consistent with the spec. > > Not true with any spec I've read. That's what I get for not R'ing TFM enough. I got the impression that the parentheses were required from a magazine article (in Transactor, I believe.) Unfortunately for me, the DOS gospel according to Bantam seems to say otherwise, and I cant find the article anyway. Oh, well, live and learn. > +> -Bill Seymour billsey@agora > Ken Yarnall /// yarnall@usceast.cs.scarolina.EDU -- \/ Jason L. Tibbitts III // | THEnet: {George|Jane|Elroy|Judy}::HONP9 /\/"Blob Shop Programmers: // | SesquiNet, Telnet, etc: HONP9@JETSON.uh.edu \/ Because We're Bored!" \X/ | CREN (BitNet): HONP9@UHVAX1 "Ewige /\ . DISCLAIMER ." Whose opinions did you think there were?" ; Blumenkraft"