Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!! Message-ID: <7039@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 14 Nov 90 13:06:25 GMT References: <114.273F7E66@myamiga.UUCP> <1990Nov14.034507.19784@hoss.unl.edu> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 16 In article <1990Nov14.034507.19784@hoss.unl.edu> 252u3130@fergvax.unl.edu (Phil Dietz) writes: > Hmmmph....with the discussion of wild cards, people have been coming > out of the cracks and harassing ARP. Boy if my memory works right (256 > bit of course), when ARP came out, it was the hottest thing to use. Not me, dude. I've been harassing ARP since the beginning. (a) It's all in assembler. That's a big no-no for me. (b) They never got it all together. It was missing major programs (like copy) and the programs that did come out tended to have weird bugs (um, non standard features if you like). I'm sure (b) was due to (a). -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .