Xref: utzoo comp.sys.apollo:7089 comp.unix.admin:520
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!utkcs2!de5
From: de5@ornl.gov (Dave Sill)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo,comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: NFS Mount Point Strategy?
Message-ID: <1990Nov14.203658.23848@cs.utk.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 90 20:36:58 GMT
References: <1990Nov10.144551.809@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> <21753@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>
Sender: news@cs.utk.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: Dave Sill <de5@ornl.gov>
Followup-To: comp.unix.admin
Organization: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Lines: 16

[note: followups redirected to comp.unix.admin]

In article <21753@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>, larsen@prism.cs.orst.edu (Scott Larsen) writes:
>
>mount all partitions under /nfs/machinename/partition.
> :
>So far we have had no problems with this naming scheme.  We have been
>using it for about 9 months now.

Is there some advantage I'm missing to having everything mounted under /nfs?
E.g., why not just /machinename/partition?

-- 
Dave Sill (de5@ornl.gov)
Martin Marietta Energy Systems
Workstation Support