Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!pacbell.com!decwrl!ucbvax!gnh-starport.cts.com!whitewolf From: whitewolf@gnh-starport.cts.com (Tae Song) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: Apple II / Mac discusson (was:Re:Official"No New Apple II's") Message-ID: Date: 10 Nov 90 17:23:41 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 13 X-Unparsable-Date: Fri Nov 9 90 at 23:51:46 (EST) You it's funny... they're right when they say the Mac IS faster... but how much faster... not very much, huh? Don't matter to me... by end of this month I'll be upgrading to a Apple IIgsx thanks to Zip Chip Inc... which will of course FLY pass an SE which is faster than a Plus... Apple can take it's Mac and SHOVE IT... That's only my opinion of course... oh, RAMFast makes my SCSI HD faster than it's possible on a SE... I can upgrade with out having to dish out the amount of money Apple wants... I mean I'd rather get a car then a fx, I don't need al that, thanks