Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:6409 comp.sys.att:10798
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shelby!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!sialis!quad!dts
From: dts@quad.sialis.mn.org (David Sandberg)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: comp.sys.3b1? (was Re: Monthly posting about Unix-PC networ
Summary: but not "comp.sys.unix-pc"
Message-ID: <627@quad.sialis.mn.org>
Date: 11 Nov 90 20:25:11 GMT
References: <1990Nov1.080516.14051@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1990Nov3.045636.12735@cs.ucla.edu> <315@sphere.UUCP> <35841@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: dts@quad.sialis.mn.org (David Sandberg)
Organization: Quadric Systems, Richfield MN
Lines: 16

In article <35841@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
>The above, coupled with John's other anecdotes, presents a VERY compelling
>case to initiate inquiry into forming a comp.sys.unix-pc.* hierarchy.  I
>sincerely wish I could devote the time myself, but I've taken on so many
>other activities that I have no additional "free" time.  I would definitely
>vote "YES" if someone sends out a formal request to form the newsgroup.

My first thought is suggest either comp.sys.3b1.* or comp.sys.7300.*;
anything but unix-pc again.  It would be nice to put an end to the
steady stream of IBM PC articles which manage to find their way into
this forum.

-- 
 \\         David Sandberg         \                             \\
 //      dts@quad.sialis.com       /  "Mobility?  We don't need  //
 \\  uunet!umn-cs!sialis!quad!dts  \    no stinking mobility!"   \\