Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:6465 comp.sys.att:10864
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!kodak!uupsi!vmp!dbk!david
From: david@dbk.uucp (David Kozinn)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: comp.sys.3b1? (was Re: Monthly posting about Unix-PC networ
Message-ID: <1990Nov16.141504.5463@dbk.uucp>
Date: 16 Nov 90 14:15:04 GMT
References: <35841@cup.portal.com> <1990Nov15.053246.10492@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <35955@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Custom Solutions, Emerson, NJ
Lines: 14

In article <35955@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
>
>Either *.3b1.* or *.7300.* or even *.pc7300.* would be reasonable alternatives.
>Beginning with a digit means the group also appears at the head of the list!

From reading these postings, it seems to me that most of us are in
agreement that using 3b1 instead of unix-pc is A Good Thing. Has there been
any great outcry of disagreement? I haven't seen any. Do we need to keep
beating this part of the discussion endlessly?
-- 
David Kozinn                     
UUCP:   uunet!vmp!dbk!david
Domain: david@dbk.vmp.com
GEnie:  D.KOZINN