Xref: utzoo comp.sys.apple2:8608 comp.sys.amiga:71896 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:3799 misc.legal:22680 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jb10320 From: jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Desdinova) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,misc.legal Subject: Re: Do *NOT* reveal or mention "hacking" information Message-ID: <1990Nov17.013618.6493@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 17 Nov 90 01:36:18 GMT References: <5V*^Z|@rpi.edu> <36465@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <14476@smoke.brl.mil> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 56 In article <14476@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes: >In article <36465@nigel.ee.udel.edu> new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New) writes: >>you may disassemble it, because FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAW SAYS YOU MAY. > >Reference, please. Fine. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ..."It is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided: 1) That such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or 2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued posession of the computer program should cease to be rightful. Any exact copies prepared in accordance with the provisions of this section may be leased, sold, or otherwise transferred, along with the copy from which such copies were prepared, only as part of the lease, sale, or other transfer of all rights in the program. Adaptations so prepared may be transferred only with the authorization of the copyright owner." United States Copyright Code title 17, &117 (17 USC 117) Your right to deprotect a program is ensured by phrase 2). Your right to deprotect a program to use it on a hard drive (depends on the definition of "essential", but I believe the "fair use" doctrine supercedes the term essential here): phrase 1) I hope this stops the discussion. It is quite obvious that it is NOT illegal to deprotect a program ("adaptation") for purposes of fair use or for archival use (note this leaves open the possibility of libraries collecting software, perhaps the Library of Congress does this). And since it's 100% LEGAL to deprotect a program, it's also 100% legal to DESCRIBE how to deprotect a program (this doesn't require arguing about fundamental human rights, which certain people have in the course of this discussion shown that they ignore). I suggest that everyone who cares clip and save this note! Anytime someone tries to tell you what THEY THINK your rights should be, shove the letter of the law up their kazoo! Are we all happy now? Long live the power of the people! p.s. It's also been established that Shrink-wrap licences are not legally binding, because the conditions for a "contract" are not upheld (either for written or oral). -- Jawaid Bazyar | Blondes in big black cars look better wearing Senior/Computer Engineering | their dark sunglasses at night. (unk. wierdo) jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu | The gin, the gin, glows in the Dark! Apple II Forever! | (B O'Cult) Comp.Sys.Apple2- Home of the Unofficial Apple II Developer Support Team (DST)